In a pivotal decision, the Florida Supreme Court recently gave the green light for a constitutional amendment on recreational marijuana to be included in the November 2024 statewide ballot. The initiative, known as Amendment 3, marks a significant step forward for the cannabis industry and serves as a powerful reminder of the strength of a democracy where the people have the power to change laws even when they’re not supported by politicians.

This victory for advocates comes after a series of setbacks that saw similar efforts to get adult-use amendments on the statewide ballot twice thwarted by the Florida Supreme Court in 2021.

The next step for it to become law is getting 60% approval from Florida voters. We expect voters to exceed that threshold as cannabis stigma continues to fade and legalization becomes less of a partisan issue. More than 70% of voters approved the 2016 ballot initiative to legalize medical marijuana and support for adult/recreational use has only grown since then. Recent polling supports these predictions and it would be a major surprise to all parties if Amendment 3 does not pass. 

Five justices ruled in favor of the measure, with only two in opposition. Justice Jamie Grosshans, writing for the majority, stated, “In light of those limited considerations, we approve the proposed amendment for placement on the ballot.” This approval underscores the careful scrutiny applied to the amendment’s language and its adherence to legal standards, despite opposition from DeSantis and others. Here is Grosshans’ full 48-pg legal opinion if you need a little light reading.

One of the key points of contention in this debate has been the clarity and fairness of the amendment’s language. Critics, including Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody, raised concerns about potential ambiguities and misleading information. However, the majority of justices found that the language met the necessary standards, paving the way for its inclusion on the ballot.

Advocates argue that legalization not only aligns with changing societal attitudes but also presents economic opportunities and benefits, including tax revenue generation and job creation.

While a victory for the industry, new and existing Florida cannabis entrepreneurs will still have regulatory headwinds from combative legislative and executive regulatory bodies who might respond to the passing of Amendment 3 with more stringent licensing requirements and complex taxation laws. This is on top of the existing federal prohibition of cannabis, which comes with its own set of banking and financial hurdles. 

Governor Ron DeSantis and other conservative voices have expressed reservations about the potential impact of recreational marijuana, citing concerns about public health and safety. However, the court’s decision emphasizes the importance of allowing voters to make informed choices and participate directly in shaping state policies.

As we look ahead to the November 2024 election, the debate surrounding recreational marijuana will undoubtedly intensify. Proponents and opponents will continue to make their cases, engaging with voters to secure their support or opposition.

Ultimately, the approval of Amendment 3 for the ballot underscores a fundamental principle of democracy—the power of the people to enact change through their collective voice. Regardless of individual opinions on recreational marijuana, this decision reflects a broader democratic process that values civic engagement and participation in shaping our communities’ futures.

If you have any questions about what Amendment 3 can mean for your existing business, or a new venture you’re considering starting, contact your trusted legal and/or business advisor to strategize how to best prepare for the anticipated changes.

The Florida Legislature recently approved Senate Bill 1698 to regulate hemp products in the state and sent it to Governor Ron DeSantis’ desk for signature. The bill amends and adds to Section 581.217, Florida Statutes–the statute governing the state hemp program. The bill imposes strict THC limits on hemp extract products while banning certain cannabinoids altogether. 

 

Considerations for Out-of-State Hemp Businesses | Mr. Cannabis LawSpecifically, the bill provides that the amount of THC in hemp extract products cannot exceed 5 milligrams per serving or 50 milligrams per container; and it prohibits the sale of products containing delta-8 THC, and other cannabinoids, including delta-10 THC, THCV, and THCP, by amending the definition of “hemp extract” to explicitly state that hemp extract does not contain the foregoing cannabinoids. If the bill becomes law, which is highly likely, then it will take effect on October 1st. 

 

The limitations and restrictions set out in SB 1698 are important for out-of-state hemp businesses to be aware of, as they apply to hemp businesses, including those domiciled out of the state, that have dealings in Florida. For instance, if an out-of-state hemp retailer offers delta-8 THC gummies for sale on its website, and consumers can purchase these gummies for delivery to Florida addresses, then the hemp business would be subject to and in violation of the new bill, which altogether bans the sale of delta-8 THC in Florida. The new bill prevents online hemp retailers from shipping certain hemp products into Florida, including hemp extract products that contain a THC concentration exceeding 5 milligrams per serving or 50 milligrams per container and products that contain delta-8 THC, delta-10 THC, THCV, or THCP. 

 

This is significant because if SB 1698 becomes law, it will have a substantial impact on out-of-state online retailers and distributors shipping to Florida. This will then also trickle down to out-of-state cultivators and manufacturers who supply hemp products to these online retailers and distributors. 

 

If the bill becomes law, in order to be compliant with the new law, any out-of-state online hemp retailer who sells hemp extract products that contain a THC concentration exceeding 5 milligrams per serving or 50 milligrams per container, or products that contain delta-8 THC, delta-10 THC, THCV, or THCP, should consider setting up some sort of mechanism or tool on their website which would deny any of these products that are now illegal in Florida from being purchased by someone in or shipped to Florida. 

 

In recent months, we have seen increased and stricter enforcement of § 581.217, Florida Statutes, by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS), and we expect to see even more inspections conducted by FDACS if the new hemp bill becomes law. Hemp businesses that receive stop-sale and/or stop-use orders from FDACS for their hemp products should contact an attorney for assistance.